“Community” writer Megan Ganz tells Alex about her upcoming “Law & Order” themed episode, whether broadcast networks are still the place to go for comedy, and what she wants to do next. Plus, Alex has a censorship problem.
“Community” fans might want to listen to me interview Megan Ganz, who wrote the bottle, documentary, and (upcoming) Law & Order episodes. There will be even more about “Community” next week in part 2.
“Community” writer Megan Ganz tells Alex about getting hired to “The Onion” at an early age and learning how to function in two of the world’s smartest writers’ rooms. She really gets going when the subject turns to her Catholic education and the Trayvon Martin shooting. Next week in part 2, look forward to even more talk about “Community.” Also this week, Alex explores adulthood by working for money and purchasing alcohol.
I won’t hold it against NBC if they have to make “business decisions.” I won’t even hold it against them for favoring Whitney over Community now that they’ve moved it to Wednesdays, where Community arguably wouldn’t work. But I think it was, let’s say, a PR mistake to simply omit the show from the schedule as if no one would notice. If you haven’t canceled it, why invite fans to act like you did?
I follow NBC like I used to follow the Chicago Bulls, so I won’t talk shit, but let’s be delicate when we’re messing with things people love. And let’s also remember that for the time being, Community’s just taking a break to play baseball.
Actor Josh Duvendeck talks about his recurring role on “Parks & Recreation,” his three LA comedy groups, and Scooby-Doo. Plus, Alex goes viral and gets noticed by “Community” creator Dan Harmon.
On Friday, I didn’t do much, because I didn’t want to miss UPS when they came with my new iPhone. I realized I’d been lagging on updating this Tumblr and Community had blown my mind the night before, so I wrote a post about that. I had seen a couple of things on the internet about the episodes airing out of order. I looked into it a little more and I realized maybe something was up. I had enough evidence to warrant a blog post on a Tumblr that averaged about ten hits a day. Plus, I got to use Skitch for the pic, one of my new favorite toys.
I saved the post. Almost immediately, my BlackBerry, in its final day of use, started beeping. And it didn’t stop. Communitythings reblogged my post. Reddit picked it up. People were excitedly tweeting at Dan Harmon. Whoa.
I don’t think I was the only one theorizing, but my post was the one that Dan Harmon refuted on Twitter. Cool!
And then we got this awesome post from the big man. Should I feel bad? Should I feel good? Should I feel anything? Does this even have anything to do with me?
2. Why I care
I have been in love with Community since NBC put the pilot up on Facebook in 2009. I wondered who Dan Harmon was whenever the credits rolled, but I either didn’t think to look him up or didn’t recognize his credits and looked no further.
At the time, I was studying (for college credit!) at The Second City. Toward the end of the program, we started to learn about screenplay structure and the hero’s journey. Over winter break, I was writing something and trying to use the structure I’d learned, but I needed help. I searched the internet and found this. Mind blown. Then I looked at the top and saw the name Dan Harmon. Okay, man, you got a fan.
Anyone who has worked with me in the past couple of years knows I have “you need go search find take return change” going around and around in my head at all times. I even printed Harmon’s article in the program for my thesis play in college, in case anyone else wanted their minds blown (the structure not only guided the writing, but played into the plot of the play).
So I hope I wasn’t responsible for giving Dan Harmon too much of a headache. I think part of being a fan of anything in 2011 is once and a while posting theories, reviews, or rants on the internet that, really, no one is supposed to read and even fewer are supposed to care about. It’s pretty ridiculous to have your heroes responding, positively or negatively, to things you write while you’re sitting around doing nothing.
By interacting with his fans the way he does, Dan Harmon (and other actively tweeting celebs, surely) has created a weird new kind of long-distance star-struck feeling. All day, people tweet at him in the hopes that he will acknowledge their existence. Why? Are we at the point where we want the television to watch us back? Do we want to be loved by those we love, even if all we can get is a tweet and all we can give is 22 minutes a week of viewership? I just know for whatever reason I wanted to tweet my theory to him and I felt feelings when he linked to my post. More specifically, there’s a certain feeling I’ve gotten the few times in my life when something I did turned into a (let’s say “relatively”) big deal. It’s like nervousness and excitement and fear. It’s when things get completely out of hand, for better or worse, and I can’t think of how to make Tumblr stop sending me an email every time someone acts on my post.
3. They Were Dead the Whole Time
What about Dan Harmon’s post about abusing power and fucking over an audience? It’s a great point and it’s something I’ve thought about. I even made this video with my comedy group, which I think is relevant.
Some people have commented on that video that the characters in LOST were not dead the whole time. The inspiration for the sketch, however, wasn’t LOST, which I didn’t watch. It was the confused comments circulating the internet after the LOST finale. Tons of discussion threads titled “so were they dead the whole time?” Posts basically like the one I wrote about Community just trying to figure out what’s going on. And somewhere in Beverly Hills, maybe there’s a writer lurking on those forums laughing and laughing because he fucked everyone (I’ll say again because I now know that sometimes things get around the internet: I’m not saying anything about LOST specifically. I’m a fan of plenty of things J.J. Abrams has written. LOST was the relevant example when I wrote the sketch, and is purposely not mentioned in it).
I watched a thriller recently in which the twist is that the people you’re tracking who are running away from the killer turn out to be the killers. I felt waaaaay fucked over. Like I’d wasted hours watching the movie. Because they spent so much time trying to convince the audience that that wasn’t a possibility. Because I thought of that possible twist long before the reveal but there were so many scenes that were clearly there to eliminate that possibility, so I forgot about it. They fucked me.
So I get that there’s a line between doing something cool and fucking people over. Would the Community audience really have felt cheated if it turned out a few episodes down the line that Jeff and Annie kissed? Would we have sent angry tweets to @danharmon? I don’t know. I think there are ways that my theory could have held water without abusing the audience. I’m not saying this as someone who fancies himself a writer; I’m saying I trust the people making this show enough that when I thought that maybe they were being sneaky, I didn’t feel fucked over. I felt excited about the possibilities.
But of course Dan Harmon is right. Cool. Sigh. He read my blog.
4. Something smart about social media
I also wanted to say something smart about social media and how things go viral, but I’ll just leave you with a Skitch of Google Analytics pageviews for this blog (and this doesn’t count anyone who read the post from other people who reblogged it):
Last night’s Community featured seven different timelines based on the roll of a die. They led you to believe that the final timeline was the real one, but I don’t believe this to be true. Here’s why.
The episode begins with a brief argument about whether Troy and Abed live in apartment 303 or 304. This episode was season three, episode four. What this hints at is that this episode takes place before the last one.
In every timeline except Jeff’s (supposedly the real one), Pierce mentions that he had sex with Eartha Kitt in an airplane bathroom. He tells Omar in 303 that the members of the study group are the only ones he’s told about that event.
Abed’s timeline is the only one in which Shirley finds out that Britta smokes pot. In 303, when Britta burns the list, Shirley says, “oh no! She’s got her marijuana lighter!”
In Abed’s timeline, he finds a nickel. At the beginning of 303, he gives Pierce a coin to pay for the water fountain.
This isn’t a proof, but from a storytelling perspective, Jeff and Annie kissing is the biggest event in any timeline (other than Pierce dying). Their relationship in 303 is alternately very friendly and extremely strained, which makes sense in a post-kitchen-make-out timeline.
Please refer all “get a life” comments to me in an alternate timeline where I wasn’t allowed to watch TV growing up and now I’m the youngest ever president of the United States.
Britta pretty much became Meg Griffin/Jerry from Parks & Rec/Cliff Claven
NOOOOOO is now the catchphrase of both Annie and Darth Vader
Another visual Greendale anus joke
A tender Oedipal scene from a parallel universe of relative normality (the part where they almost kiss was from a version of this show that isn’t this ridiculous but is still about weird stuff)
This is my favorite show. All the talk I’ve heard about it getting more normal or relatable or whatever I think is not the plan they’re going with. I will choose to enjoy the ridiculousness and not worry about cancellation or how things work in real life.